Social protection
In: Development in practice, Band 17, Heft 4-5
ISSN: 0961-4524
43509 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Development in practice, Band 17, Heft 4-5
ISSN: 0961-4524
Conventional wisdom in European studies has long held that social policy is not an area in which the European Union can make a large difference. Solidarity, it is said, can only develop in societies where clear boundaries exist between individuals. Such is not the case in the EU, where a citizen's primary allegiance is to his own country. Redistribution being a zero-sum game, the majority method of decision-making is required, which may only be viable if the legitimacy of central institutions is clearly established. The legitimacy of the EU institutions, however, is said to be weak. In addition, a number of different traditions of welfare protection co-exist within the EU, as has been stressed by Gösta Esping-Andersen (1990). Citizens are strongly attached to their national brand of protection: in several countries, this is even regarded as a key element of national identity. The history of European integration has done little to belie these views. Social policy has experienced relatively modest progress, and the difficulties inherent in the adoption of European financial perspectives, undermined by the evils of "juste retour" have shown that redistribution and unanimity are indeed at odds (.).
BASE
Conventional wisdom in European studies has long held that social policy is not an area in which the European Union can make a large difference. Solidarity, it is said, can only develop in societies where clear boundaries exist between individuals. Such is not the case in the EU, where a citizen's primary allegiance is to his own country. Redistribution being a zero-sum game, the majority method of decision-making is required, which may only be viable if the legitimacy of central institutions is clearly established. The legitimacy of the EU institutions, however, is said to be weak. In addition, a number of different traditions of welfare protection co-exist within the EU, as has been stressed by Gösta Esping-Andersen (1990). Citizens are strongly attached to their national brand of protection: in several countries, this is even regarded as a key element of national identity. The history of European integration has done little to belie these views. Social policy has experienced relatively modest progress, and the difficulties inherent in the adoption of European financial perspectives, undermined by the evils of "juste retour" have shown that redistribution and unanimity are indeed at odds (.).
BASE
In: Social trends, Band 40, Heft 1, S. 109-123
ISSN: 2040-1620
In: Social trends, Band 39, Heft 1, S. 109-125
ISSN: 2040-1620
In: The Welfare State: A General Theory, S. 94-105
In: Social trends, Band 41, Heft 1, S. 66-89
ISSN: 2040-1620
In: The Diversity of Emerging Capitalisms in Developing Countries, S. 185-212
In: Development in practice, Band 17, Heft 4-5, S. 511-522
ISSN: 1364-9213
In: Development and cooperation: D+C, Band 42, Heft 9-10, S. 24-41
ISSN: 0723-6980
World Affairs Online
In: Development and cooperation: D+C, Band 40, Heft 11, S. 409-427
ISSN: 0723-6980
World Affairs Online
In: Quantitative methods in social protection series
ISSN: 1681-9365